Archive for the ‘science’ Category

(English) THE MAKING OF THE EINSTEIN FRANKENSTEIN

Montag, Oktober 8th, 2012

First off, the Father of Theory of Relativity is Jules Henri Poincaré.

Back to 1905

The concept of energetically charged ether is the predominant scientific doctrine of the day. Tesla’s electric cars and wireless controls and electricity was wowed and awed at with fear, bewilderment, and amazement, calling him the magician of science.

Tesla is ushering the world into the new age of electricity with the brilliant world fare success of his alternating current (AC) power, free wireless electricity, radio, telephone (Marconi used seventeen of his patents), radar, and over seven hundred of other patents, most way ahead of his time.

Tesla’s ideas of free energy scare off the financial and political support of JP Morgan and Rothschild as they scheme a plan to neutralize Tesla’s incredible fame and inventions by creating a genius whose ideas they can control and such an opportunity arose with the appearance of Albert Einstein.

As the plot thickens, the international bankers, along with the Warburg physicist David Hilbert, Max Planck, and Lindelman, fearing the power of Nicola Tesla, hired, according to this version of this story, Max Planck to prepare a subtle “science” and candidate to replace Tesla on the scientific throne.

The Making Of Einstein

In school he was a poor, mediocre, student and in university he went to teachers college where there were no tests to fail. He got his high school teacher certificate, and that was the extent of his formal education.

Einstein married Mileva Marić, from a wealthy family in Titel in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, she was his fellow student at the Zurich Polytechnic, who later became his first wife and had a son together, who from his teens spent the rest of his life in a mental house for whistle blowing on his dad.

In September 1905 Special Relativity paper, organized by Max Planck, was published. The article was written for Einstein by qualified people, who used his wife, Mileva, as an explanation to where it all of a sudden came from, as she went to the same school with Tesla and shared the same teacher, as this story goes.

However, the original scientific papers in question published in 1905 are ghost written and translated from original work of Poincare in French to German by Ferdinand von Lindelman (b.1852) under the direction of his friend Max Planck and shadowy others.

The articles, there were two of the papers published out of the blue in 1905 under the guise of Einstein/Mileva branding, most likely based on the research of Jules Henri Poincaré, who gets the larger part of the credit, and Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, his friend and collaborator for over a decade, academic Logunov wrote about the actual significant role of Poincare.

There are two main articles that were written and there are many versions of the story. The French propose that it was David Hilbert, but that’s besides the point, since the articles were cooked to be wrong in the first place.

In 1905 there were big political tensions between France and Germany. The Germans already knew of the work by Poincare but no individual scientist had the audacity to steal his research. Only a government could organize such an affair.

So the Germans approached young Einstein who was already accused of plagiarism, and told him that if he agrees to do this, in worst case scenario if he gets caught then he will get simply another plagiarism charge, which is not big deal, and in the best case, he will become world famous scientist. so, no brainer.

Einstein was very ambitious young man who was already plagiarising his way through the academia and he was natural choice, hair and all, for the biggest scientific conspiracy of the century. The Manchurian Candidate of sorts, or Shakespeare of science, whichever is more flattering.

At that time Poincare was already a genius old man, extremely humble and generous. He reportedly did not mind others using his work for personal gain much. When it comes to General Relativity there are two theories, the French theory is based on the riverly between France and Germany, and the Warburg theory is based on a conspiracy propagated by the bankers to suppress Tesla’s inventions and ideas.

Warburg bank is one of the biggest banks in the world, second only to Rothschild. Naturally the Warburg is a key figure in this story.

Stage Two: 1919 ANNOUNCING THE GREATEST GENIUS EVER LIVED with “his” rather twisted ideas of reality TO THE ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD!!!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Stay tune for more juicy revelations in my up coming new book THE MAKING OF THE EINSTEIN FRANKENSTEIN. ;)

“A handwritten letter in which the originator of the Theory of Relativity Albert Einstein refers to God as a “product of human weaknesses” is up for sale on eBay with a starting price of $3 million. The private letter was never meant to be published.”

http://rt.com/art-and-culture/news/einstein-god-letter-bible-915/

Share

Science vs Religion or Evolution vs Creation

Dienstag, Februar 23rd, 2010

Excerpt from ‘What Is’ book by Alexander Braun.

Science is a religion and full of holes as any religion is. Scientists still to this day can’t explain where the oil comes from, something humanity uses every day. According to the official version, it comes from organic matter, but that would produce coal, while there are a lot of offshore oil that comes from under the ocean floor where there is very little organic life and oil being lighter than water would have been then found on a surface, which is not the case. So, what is oil? The answer is unknown by science. Amazingly and ridiculous as it sounds, the stunning revelation is that our scientists as mythological in their “scientific” methods and intellectual constructs as our church fathers’ claims of geocentric universe and whatever number of angels can party on a tip of a needle. The origins of oil is one of the biggest scientific cover-ups of our time and embarrassing realities of science that the academia doesn’t want to acknowledge.

In my reason, since the offshore drilling goes deep under the ocean floor it makes a possibility for a bunch of algae getting stuck there to metamorphose into the vast oil fields all over the world very slim if none. Besides, according to the US NAVY detailed surveys maps done using special sonar technology which measured the age of the ocean floor that showed it to be 600 million years old at most near the continental shelf where it is the oldest as it grows spreading apart from the middle of the Atlantic and the Pacific riffs. (video)

The cosmic spores that landed in water have evolved into plankton and produced the plant kingdom, the ones that landed in moist soil became algae and produced the animal kingdom above the ground and the fungi kingdom beneath the ground, all of the above produced human kingdom, but not the oil, which most definitely came from no algae.

I think that the oil, most likely, is synthesized inside the Earth’s core as by-product of the volcanic activity utilizing extremely high pressures and temperatures, however the science is silent about it. The Earth has actually doubled in size since the extinction of dinosaurs some 65 million years ago and is obviously growing, as anything else in the universe, universe including, and the fact that the most of the ocean floor is only a couple of hundred million years old compared with the Earth’s crust measuring 4-6 billion years, this too is being ignored by most scientists, even though it is obvious that all continents were at one time together in almost a perfect sphere of various minerals and virtually no water whatsoever for billions of years.

Religion is based on morals nurtured by virtues, science is based on method nurtured by experience, both are real and correct in many ways from their point of reference, as when two people standing on either side of a spinning wheel arguing over which way the wheel is turning, clockwise or counterclockwise, however both are correct. So, is it the evolution or creation, some might be wondering. The reality is that in today’s world there is no debate, a mass, about it at all. Then who won this ages old battle?

Well, the evolutionists, since the Pope has agreed with the Darwin’s creed back in the 60′s, granted, as God’s divine plan and direct involvement. No more 5000 years old Earth, aka the young Earth theory, for the Catholics world wide. The Protestants not qualified either since they have embraced the evolution theory before even Catholics did. What about the Muslim world, can it lend significant support to the Creationist camp? Well, not quiet. Remember that modern science in large parts came from the Arab world, where most people are well educated and know better than to believe that the world is only 5000 years old and that the dinosaur bones God placed on Earth to test our faith. OK then, what about the Jews, some may wonder. First off, there are only around 14 million people in the world who identify themselves as being Jewish and majority do not believe the 5780 years Earth anyway, and question everything as part of the Jewish Talmudic tradition, so regardless, that is not a factor in any case.

Moving on. Where then all these masses of religious creationist fanatics who lend significant opposition to the Darwin’s evolution theory today? How many of them are there? What percentage of people are we talking about, 50/50%, 20/80%?? Well, counting occasional Mormon and Jehovah witness and some other obscure fringe groups and individuals, there are actually not that many people in the creationist camp, about 1 to 2 % total of all people alive today. What?! That is it?!!! Then what about all this Creation vs Evolution debate on TV during the George Bush presidential campaigns? It is a so-called “wedge” issue, in likes of pro-choice vs pro-life, big government vs big business, environment vs economy, something to keep public focused on while they’re being robbed or killed or whatever reason for utilizing demagogue tool of the wedge issue polemics.

Polemics or not, where all this Bible thumpers who elected Bush twice into the office? The sad reality is that there never were nor are masses of the creationist religious fanatics now and during the Bush administration days, and the election results were simply fabricated and the election literally stolen, twice, from American people, hence was the need to invent fictional “masses” of creationist-uber-right-wing-conservative-Bible-belt support base for Bush, designed on the old basic principle of war – to divide and conquer.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Excerpt from book ‘Technopoly – The Surrender of Culture to Technology’ by Neil Postman, pages 78-79, chapter ‘The Broken Defenses’.

“[my comments in brackets...] Scripture has at its core such a powerful mythology that even the residue of that mythology is still sufficient to serve as an exacting control mechanism for some people. It provides, first of all, a theory about the meaning of life and therefore rules on how one is to conduct oneself. [...] the theory is as follows: There is one God, who created the universe and all that is in it. Although humans can never fully understand God, He[/She/It] has revealed Him[/Her/It]self and His[/Her/Its] will to us throughout hi[/her/it]story, particularly through His[/Her/Its] commandments and the testament of prophets as recoded in the Bible [and other "holy" scriptures]. The greatest of these commandments tells us that humans are to love God and express their love for Him[/Her/It] through love, mercy, and justice to our fellow humans [and all life]. At the end of time, all nations and humans will appear before God to be judged, and those who have followed His[/Her/Its] commandments will find favor in His[/Her/Its] sight. Those who have denied God and the commandments will perish utterly in the darkness that lies outside the presence of God’s light [God as the bearer of the light? I wonder... but anywho...].
To borrow from [Rabbi] Hillel: That is the theory. All the rest is commentary. [as I say, The body is holy, the rest is a story.]
Those who believe [be-lie-eve] in this theory — particularly those who accept the Bible as the literal word of God [the crazies] — are free to dismiss other theories [they are also free of burdening weight of reason] about the origin and meaning of life and to give minimal weight to the facts on which other theories are based. Moreover, in observing God’s laws, and the detailed requirements of their enactment [such as committing fashion and other crimes], believers receive guidance what books they should not read [that's an easy one], about what plays and films they should not see, about what music they should not hear, about what subjects their children should not study [another easy one], and so on [more like on and on and on...]. For strict fundamentalists of the Bible [what I call hopelessly possessed by the demons], the theory and what followers from it seal them off [in the mental hospitals would be the most appropriate] from unwanted information [which is the rest of the civilized society, Galilei and Bruno would have agreed, to name a few], and in that way their actions are invested with meaning, clarity, and, they believe, moral authority [well, lets just say that whatever moral that there was in the beginning got destroyed by the religious fanatics long before the Spanish inquisition].

Those who reject the Bible’s theory and who believe, let us say, in the theory of Science [aka government officials, lawyers, police, military, etc.] are also protected from unwanted information [so not to warp their fragile little minds]. Their theory [Alas, if there was only one!], for example, instructs them to disregard information about astrology [I thought that astrology was proto astronomy as alchemy was proto chemistry], dianetics [sounds too weird], and creationism [well, I think by now we all have heard about it more than once], which they usually label as medieval superstition [as in global warming] or subjective opinion [i.e. I am the centre of the universe]. Their theory fails to give any guidance about moral information and, by definition, gives little weight to information that falls outside the constraints of science [such as the eugenics of a perfect race to be sarcastic about it]. Undeniably, fewer and fewer people are bound in any serious way to Biblical or other religious traditions as a source of compelling attention and authority, the result of which is that they make no moral decisions, only practical ones [or in other words, More and more people leave church and coming back to God].” Allelujah!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Share

(English) μετά φυσικά (metaphysics)-(what is)

Freitag, Oktober 30th, 2009

Share

(English) μετά φυσικά (metaphysics)

Dienstag, Februar 17th, 2009

It can be stated as a generality in our Post Modern age that God is all things to all people. The concept of God being the center of human conciousness. Or better put: A force that is self evident throughout all creation. Thus God is revealed plainly by the simple fact that the ability to question weather or not there is a God logically follows the question: What is the nature of such a force in the universe? This is in and of itself the proof of such a force. It requires an equal amount of faith to believe in the non existance of such a force as it does to believe in its existance. As well It must be understood on all levels of the individual (see metaphysics post)

On the social level the general similarities in understanding are the basis for civilized behavior. (or morality) This becomes the root of the collective human consciousness which in turn is the foundation for social law. Though social law in the end varies from culture to culture Its origional intent being to maintain peace within a chaotic mass of individualism that seeks solely to appease Mazlo’s hierarchy(1) is not.

The structures of socioty including the economic engine which drives it mirror the triad of the individual. The conflicts which arise mirroring the state of the internal conflict of mind body and spirit. It is a paralell of two universes which are connected and thus negate the absolute of the blind watchmaker(2). Conflict in essence being the discord caused by the actual or perceived opposition of needs, values and interests.     It is the end result of this action which releases energy neccesary to create and forge new states within the universe. An equally direct prarlell to the common understanding of the concept of creation.

*Note: Conflict is the discord between minds. It’s need to involve the physical (on either the social or individual level) is an undermining of higher mental function, and thus conscious (or moral behavior)

If then, Conflict is the dissonance of two minds seeking resolution through a process of releasing such energy in this sense is it negative or is the suppression of conflict (or debate) in the name of peace. . .immoral? Being that energy released from such actions of mental dissonance create the necessary energy to forge new ideas, concepts and understanding. should not the three major world Religions sit in good company with one another to explore their relative harmony’s and discords? would not greater understanding of WHAT the nature of their root interest (God) be better understood and would not this be mutually beneficial. Indeed Jesus Christ the founder of the Christian faith claimed himself to be a Rabbi, then in that case what disagreement do Jews have with Christians that cannot be mutually beneficial? Is not Abraham the common thread between these two and the Islam?

Even within individual faiths denominational segregation negates the understanding of Universal truths. This  making Religion (and its doctrine) live up to its root meaning “In Chains. . .” as the term originally evolved in Latin

(will update revise and edit. . unfinished)


Share

20 Besucher online
1 Gäste, 19 Bots, 0 Mitglied(er)
Meiste Besucher heute: 20 um/am 12:07 am UTC
Diesen Monat: 53 um/am 06-10-2013 04:35 pm UTC
Dieses Jahr: 53 um/am 06-10-2013 04:35 pm UTC
Jederzeit: 53 um/am 02-24-2012 03:40 am UTC

Powered by eShop v.6

theUniverse.name