It can be stated as a generality in our Post Modern age that God is all things to all people. The concept of God being the center of human conciousness. Or better put: A force that is self evident throughout all creation. Thus God is revealed plainly by the simple fact that the ability to question weather or not there is a God logically follows the question: What is the nature of such a force in the universe? This is in and of itself the proof of such a force. It requires an equal amount of faith to believe in the non existance of such a force as it does to believe in its existance. As well It must be understood on all levels of the individual (see metaphysics post)
On the social level the general similarities in understanding are the basis for civilized behavior. (or morality) This becomes the root of the collective human consciousness which in turn is the foundation for social law. Though social law in the end varies from culture to culture Its origional intent being to maintain peace within a chaotic mass of individualism that seeks solely to appease Mazlo’s hierarchy(1) is not.
The structures of socioty including the economic engine which drives it mirror the triad of the individual. The conflicts which arise mirroring the state of the internal conflict of mind body and spirit. It is a paralell of two universes which are connected and thus negate the absolute of the blind watchmaker(2). Conflict in essence being the discord caused by the actual or perceived opposition of needs, values and interests. It is the end result of this action which releases energy neccesary to create and forge new states within the universe. An equally direct prarlell to the common understanding of the concept of creation.
*Note: Conflict is the discord between minds. It’s need to involve the physical (on either the social or individual level) is an undermining of higher mental function, and thus conscious (or moral behavior)
If then, Conflict is the dissonance of two minds seeking resolution through a process of releasing such energy in this sense is it negative or is the suppression of conflict (or debate) in the name of peace. . .immoral? Being that energy released from such actions of mental dissonance create the necessary energy to forge new ideas, concepts and understanding. should not the three major world Religions sit in good company with one another to explore their relative harmony’s and discords? would not greater understanding of WHAT the nature of their root interest (God) be better understood and would not this be mutually beneficial. Indeed Jesus Christ the founder of the Christian faith claimed himself to be a Rabbi, then in that case what disagreement do Jews have with Christians that cannot be mutually beneficial? Is not Abraham the common thread between these two and the Islam?
Even within individual faiths denominational segregation negates the understanding of Universal truths. This making Religion (and its doctrine) live up to its root meaning “In Chains. . .” as the term originally evolved in Latin
(will update revise and edit. . unfinished)
Metaphysics
NOTES
TROPE Trading Game Rules + theUniverse.name Business Plan
