E=mc2 is rubbish!
17 June 2013 at 12:23
mass 
/mas/
Noun
A coherent, typically large body of matter with no definite shape.
Adjective
Relating to, done by, or affecting large numbers of people or things.
Verb
Assemble or cause to assemble into a mass or as one body: "both countries began massing troops in the region".
Synonyms
noun.  heap - multitude - crowd - bulk - pile - lump
adjective.          massive - wholesale
verb.    collect - gather - accumulate - muster - assemble
 
en·er·gy 
/ˈenərjē/
Noun
The strength and vitality required for sustained physical or mental activity.
A feeling of possessing such strength and vitality.
Synonyms
power - vigour - vigor - vim - zip - strength - pep
 
Which came first mass or energy? Did they simultaneously come into existence? This is NOT what our Creator teaches us. Our Creator said Let there be... and it was so. Energy is first indicated in the void. Energy necessarily brought mass into existence. The two cannot therefore be equivalent in any way.
Is a certain amount of energy present in all mass?
How about an object that on earth would weigh 100 mega-tons at its surface? Take that object and place it in the 4th dimension (which is what all time and space exists in). So out away from other objects and so far out in the void that it receives no heat (energy) from anyone or anything. This object drops in temperature to absolute zero. Does it have mass? Can it be weighed? Is it's mass exactly the same as it was on the surface of the earth? Motionless, even its atomic structure motionless at absolute zero, there it is. The motionless mass exists doing no measurable work; no measureable force just an inorganic mass frozen in time and space. How much energy does this motionless mass have? Is it the same as it was on the surface of the earth at earth's ambient temperature? Would it be the same as mass that weighed likewise at the surface of the earth of unstable atomic structure? Can mass even exist coherently without a certain amount of energy present to hold it together? At absolute zero does the non-moving particles of an atom simply disintegrate no longer showing the covalent bonds (energy in the motion that establishes these bonds) that once held the lump or mass of whatever together? Or of chemical reactions like the sun and stars?
While entire mathematical and scientific formulae have evolved attempting to reconcile this faulty theory; more will only continue to try in VAIN to prove it. Why? because it is fundamentally FALSE. Energy and Mass are independent terms! They are in NO WAY equivalent! It is as simple as Life and Death. A person dies and breathes their last breath. Their spirit separates from the mass of their corporal form. Where now is the energy? It is with the spirit irrespective of the mass of their decaying flesh.
The Power/Energy that created the universe does not want people to be confused or baffled in an endless quest to try and create some kind of equivalency that simply does not exist. Energy exists irrespective of mass. Not all mass has equal measureable amounts of energy; to attempt to describe a relationship between the two mathematically would result in an infinite list for as many different types and amounts of mass as exist in the Universe. This notion is false at its conception and in the observable universe and is why all the formulae in vain only attempt to define some equivalency between the two when there is none.
It may sound cool... the speed of light squared; that is. As if throwing an intangible, inconceivable constant into the mix somehow has anything whatsoever to do with it. What if he had stated it was the speed of light cubed? or to the 12th power? would we then think all the more "what a genius"? A popular saying sums up most of what I think of preposterous scientific theories (especially the theory of evolution) in that we must remember some people adhere to it. The arrogance of science that attempts to rend away from declared manifest truth by our Creator is summed up in the expression, "If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle them with your bullshit." So with the opinions of billions, remember to seek the Ultimate Authority who will not deceive you in any way.
No, my friends, it is a fine thing to imagine; it is after all evidence of energy (the presence of our spirits) and is what children of the Creator do; as they were created in His Image. But to equivalate/equivocate in any way energy and mass is to fly in the face of the reality our Creator made for us. Any one of his children can imagine all kinds of things but it is God Almighty that ultimately defines and is Truth. It may be true that it takes energy to give the resemblance of matter and mass its existence as our Creator has taught us that substance/mass is the evidence of faith/energy such that all mass is a depiction of a certain amount of energy; that is the faith that presents it. This in no way creates an equivalency between the two for the same faith/energy that sustains the mass can eradicate it at will. All mass can vanish away but energy will still exist; it is the Power that brought mass into existence and that Power is Eternal. Whereas, mass and matter we are told by our Creator is not; as all things visible are passing away. Energy is invisible and mass is not. These terms are in no way interchangeable; it was folly to suggest such from the onset and time people everywhere realized E=mc2 is rubbish! (squared - there is no superscript function in this word processing software) "energy equals mass multiplied by the variable speed of light squared" is absolute rubbish!

(via Michael Swenson)
https://www.facebook.com/notes/michael-swenson/emc2-is-rubbish/485479484864349