Guaranteed Minimum Income.

With the Police budget at one billion and over four billion wasted in Ontario power plant scandal, growing food prices, technological unemployment, the ever increasing production rates of the consumer goods, yet also yield the wider spread of poverty and despair. 

It is clear that the old ways of doing business as usual is crippling not only the economic growth but the spiritual, mental, emotional, and physical growth as well for ever increasing segment of the population.

More and more people are unceremoniously pushed to the brink of survival, forced to fend for themselves outside of the ever tightening circle of the well off elites and their cronies, dealing with the brute natural forces and endure human caused challenges.

Thus, if government wants to govern well, it has to take care of its people, then the guaranteed minimum income would be a way to incorporate all citizenry in the country's economic life and prosperity. 

Not a rocket science, in private sector the corporations are expected to pay dividends to their shareholders, and who are the citizens of a country and residents of a city but other than the shareholders? 

What is the nature and purpose of a group if the survival alone is easier than starving to death while being part of it? What would corporate investors think if the board has decided to stop paying its shareholders their dividends and its employees their salaries? 

This is economic discrimination. Enough is enough! Canada must implement the Guaranteed Minimum Income, and start treating its citizen base as shareholders whose GDP dividend should be enough to comply with the UN Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, specifically Article 25, which states: 

"(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection."

Why does the so-called de facto government thinks that it is somehow OK to ignore the charter rights but also the basic human needs and rights, that after many world wars were enshrined in the UN Law? If the government wants to actually govern, not only play the role, then taking care of most vulnerable is how the success of such government is judged: the affordable housing, clean water and air, addressing the common basic needs of individual members and various groups, industries in as fair, reasonable, moral, ethic, effective, efficient, environmentally friendly way possible.

In increasingly automated and mechanized economy based on the criminal negligence and exploitation of the natural and human rights and resources by a small group of elites who control most of the world's corporations, governments, and banks, the wealth distribution is skewed toward making rich richer and the poor poorer, with the middle class now stretched to its limits starting to disappear, into oblivion, joining the masses of the working poor, unemployed, and bankrupt.

When Life is a Bitch,
Lynch The Rich!

https://www.facebook.com/groups/727926250630409/