Discrimination vs Political Correctness
Friday, 29 January 2010 at 02:02

Here we have a menu of options: private personal, private group, public personal, and public interest at large.

An individual is not the same concept as a group of individuals, more so an individual is effected by the group in psychological and physiological ways known as group hypnosis, mass hallucinations, and peer pressure.

Information is most detailed on the individual level, the larger the audience the more generalized and stereotyped the information becomes, thus in order to be perceived by a group, which acts predictably in a group dynamic, the information details are scaled to fit the attention span available, due to a freak of nature -- the self-induced mass hypnosis and hallucinations -- because the larger the group the dumber it begets. Nothing personal.

Personal religious believes are, well, personal and should be kept that way and when it comes to the public policies of the governments representing public interests at large shalt not be sold, advertised, or politicized due to the fact that the world is manifesting itself in plural not single way, form, and purpose.

What works for one person may not be appropriate for another, would it be defined by their medical condition, location, age, social status, or interests. Publicly displaying personal religious views is taking God's name in vein which is a major sin according to some old religious traditions.

The big brother is watching, so if you can't fight them, join them. Besides, who isn't a fascist nowadays and not discriminating against something or someone outside their personal scope of interests and personal circle of familiarity. All private companies by definition are fascists due to their legal responsibility to their shareholders first, which may or may not be beneficent to the other folks.

The individual is a single person, persona (mask) protecting the ego (self), the group is plural term denoting collection of individuals. The rights and responsibilities of an individual in the group is different from the rights of the group which were provided to the group to carry out the set of responsibilities and obligations to its individual members.

For example, in a group called buffet a special team is selected by individual members to make sure that different dishes are provided in the buffet for general membership indiscriminately, while individual members pick and choose, i.e. discriminate, the specific dishes to eat, each according to personal taste, desire, and needs, that were shaped by the individual experiences.

Therefore, while an individual can't help but to discriminate constantly, discerning one thing from another in continually changing chaotic circumstances with multitude options and variables in their desperate attempt to maintain some sort of order and function in personal life and provide for the necessary bodily functions, then the governing body of a group which suppose to represent the agreed interests of all individual members cannot and shalt not act as an individual by going around discriminating, but must be neutral to uphold political correctness, the role of it in this case, in carrying out the mandate entrusted by its membership for the benefit of all individual members, thus resulting in a collective benefit for the entire group.

In modern day, however, of inverted and mirrored propaganda, the rhetoric changes on its head; the individual is forced and brainwashed to act like a state and behave politically correct -- to love everyone and everything indiscriminately -- while the state is acting as a complete playground bully, running around threatening everybody with the deadly weapons, screaming, stomping, and cursing like a child, and discriminating left right and center. The simple brain of an average simple folk cannot possibly withstand such a high standard of modus operandi nor decipher clever propaganda carefully crafted by the saboteurs of their freedoms and wellbeing.

In conclusion, keep your personal religious private group crap to yourself and to your private group, I am not interested in it, and displaying it in public constitutes for silent terrorism and brainwashing, ideologically infused, propaganda. Religion is political in nature and doesn't mix well with the western style democracy politics -- religion is an opium of the masses and majority are brain dead zombies from it, the religious fanatics would be better outfitted in a restraining jackets. The bottom line is if we are going to share our western secular and multi-ethnic democracy the religious folk has to adopt to us not us to them. The religions had their shot at the rule and it turned very fast into the hell on earth every time.

All religions are guilty of mass murder, genocide, and crimes against humanity, therefore allowing public display of religious outfits is equivalent to having a bunch of dressed up Nazis parading around shouting their barks. Religion is absolutely the same intolerable fascism but disguised as a passion of a different fashion.

As in genetic diversity, cultural diversity is necessary ingredient for the survival of the species, in any meaningful way, unless living in the unique society is the goal where everybody looks alike, thinks alike and watch the same tv show. I think the nature has different ideas in mind.